A Patent Patient

Rather than reporting on the news, or discussing topical affairs, I’d like to tell you a personal story. The thesis will be, of course, that patents are painful in the long run. But I will not present real data. I will instead discuss a personal tale of how they have done a disservice.
It might be an appeal to emotion, and a straw man, and a personal bias, so I’m just gonna get those out of the way. This is an entirely personal experience.

By way of introduction, I have facioscapulahumeral muscular dystrophy (blessedly shortened to FSHD). That’s a long winded medical technical way of saying “my face, shoulder and upper arm muscles are fucked”. It’s not entirely accurate: my glutes, hamstrings, triceps, abs and pecs are also functionally useless. It’s not nice to live with. I find it difficult to garden, clean the the house, or merely get around. And it does make me so very, very frustrated; about quite a few surprising things. For example, my particular dystrophy is the only one to cause chronic pain, so I have had to learn to deal with pain management strategies.

In a way, it’s not so bad. I could have been born 30 years earlier, before we sequenced the human genome. The prospect for treatment is actually quite bright. As Carl Sagan (a personal hero) once famously observed “how lucky we are, to live in this time”. And I agree, but that does not mean that there is not work to be done. The luck of this time is held by few, and those few generally have no vested interest in this luck other than charging me for it.

Now, there are no cures. But there are treatments. In fact there is one that in clinical trials showed a 30% increase in muscle function. And not just for FSHD, it works for other conditions too. It was called MYO-029. A mono-clonal antigen that suppressed the expression of a gene known as myostatin. This gene downregulates the development of muscle tissue. It evolved because converting all food to muscle in a hunter gatherer society left you with no reserves for lean times. In the modern world, of course, this does not matter.

Wyeth pharmaceuticals developed this treatment and currently own the patent on it. They developed this 6 years ago as of the time of writing. They got it past first and second phase clinical trials. That means it’s safe and works. And it’s easy produce, as long as you have a bioreactor, you can make as much as they have horse serum for. Sounds ideal for stopping the gap and maintaining my quality of life. If only things were so simple.
Wyeth own the patent on it. This might be fine if they allowed others to use it, but they do not. And it also might be fine if they were going to sell it to me. But they won’t. The kicker? Muscular dystrophy is too uncommon to be profitable. But it does work, they took out a patent on it, and even registered “stamulamab” as a trademark. But Wyeth, for the next 25 years, will be able to tell me that they cannot be fucked developing a treatment for me. A treatment, that, if I could get the antigen I could make myself in a 2000$ bioreactor. And believe me, if I could get it I’d pay the 2000$.

Instead they sit on top of a patent. The most promising interim treatment to me and thousands of other MD sufferers around the world is being kept from us because it’s just not profitable to develop a product for so small a market. And it’s not profitable to give up the patent, because if someone tries to develop a pirate treatment, the remuneration is worth the litigation. That’s right, litigation is worth more than developing a product I could very definitely use.

For this reason I do not agree with patents. At the very minimum, no patents on biological entities like antigens, or chemicals, or software. And neither should you. It might not seem like patents are an important issue to you, but you don’t know who’s holding out on you. I have the dubious advantage of knowing how I’m being dicked over. And that’s the only difference, knowledge.

And now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ll be lying on the floor, drunk, exhausted, and angry because I could be less of a cripple and because there’s nothing stopping it other than rent-seeking protectionism.


Kommentare

9 comments for A Patent Patient

  1. Resly commented at

    A fucking disgrace, I tell you. How about starting a kickstarter of a petition?

  2. ruediger commented at

    Hey,
    I’d suggest you to get hold of the patent text, start a wiki about it, make it public
    and try to raise some funds (kickstarter maybe), and invite physicians, pharmacists and biologists to work on how to produce it. Maybe someone is able and willed to do it secretly?
    Good luck,
    Rüdiger

  3. Kiwipeso commented at

    Laser, I sympathise fully with you there. If my condition was rare, I would be in exactly the same boat as you. I suggest that you lookup the patent online, print out the details and then get the bioreactor. I have heard that the next generation of 3d printers will be capable of printing pharmaceuticals, so that might be worth looking into.

  4. James C commented at

    Muscular dystrophy is too uncommon to be profitable.

    BS, even if that’s what they claim. They wouldn’t have done the medical research without a market analysis, and even if they got the market analysis wrong, and it really isn’t profitable, they’ve already spent the money on the medical research, so selling the drug would, at worst, help mitigate their losses. They’re not sitting on it because it’s not profitable, they’re sitting on it because selling it would make something else less profitable. Possibly it’s something else they’re selling, and they’ve just realised; possibly it’s something else they’ve just come up with; or possibly it’s something someone else sells, and they’ve been offered a better profit for sitting on the patent. There’s more money to be made in managing a condition than curing it.

    And it’s not profitable to give up the patent, because if someone tries to develop a pirate treatment, the remuneration is worth the litigation.

    BS. Patent trolls do a good business in software patents, but not in pharmaceuticals. There’s more money to be made with pharmaceutical patents from selling drugs or licensing than from litigation. (Although in some cases there’s even more money to be made from being paid to sit on a patent.)

    At the very minimum, no patents on biological entities like antigens, or chemicals, or software.

    It would be a bit naff to have patents on other things but not pharmaceuticals and chemicals, because pharmaceuticals and chemicals are the only industries where the value of innovation exceeds the cost of litigation–ie the pharmaceutical and chemical industries are the only ones where patents do more overall good than harm (not that I expect it’s any consolation to you though). However if we were to abolish patents on pharmaceuticals and chemicals, then it would make far more sense to abolish all patents then abolish patents that cause a nett benefit, and keep ones that cause a nett harm.

  5. Steffan Browning MP Green Party commented at

    I have tabled a Supplementary Order Paper to the Patents Bill currently in front of Parliament. If it can get enough support, it will forbid patents on life, (organisms and their traits). Patents are what make these mega agri-chemical corporates wealthy, whether it be through new drugs, pesticides or GE crops. They care little about the ill, consumers or farmers. Help me push back, and get your very good example into as many opinion columns as possible.

  6. It’s such a shame that our current system is dominated by the pursuit of profit instead of the genuine desire to help others and make this a better place for all of us. I can not imagine how you feel in your condition but I can certainly identify with the frustration of being powerless in the face of rampant greed.

  7. James C commented at

    @LaserFace: Wondering exactly what the deal is here, I typed “Wyeth pharmaceuticals” into Google, and the first listed result was “Wyeth is now part of Pfizer.” It looks like Wyeth announced their abandonment of MYO-029/Stamulamab about a year and a half before officially being bought out by Pfizer. If you want to figure out why Wyeth abandoned MYO-029/Stamulamab, I think the obvious place to start would be to look into whether Pfizer makes money from managing a condition that MYO-029/Stamulamab would cure.

    @Steffan Browning: The costs of patent litigation exceed their investment value in all industries except chemistry and pharmaceuticals. See:
    Bessen, James & Meurer, Michael J. (2008) Patent Failure. Princeton University Press.

    @Emmanuel Gonot: Forget a genuine desire to help others, it’s not going to happen. What we need is a system that, as far as practicable, apportions profit to those who benefit society, so people can continue with rampant greed and the pursuit of profit, as they always have, but unintentionally benefit others in the process.

  8. What i do not understood is in truth how you’re now not actually a lot more well-appreciated than you may be
    right now. You’re very intelligent. You realize therefore considerably in terms
    of this topic, made me personally imagine it from numerous
    various angles. Its like men and women are not fascinated unless it is
    one thing to do with Girl gaga! Your individual stuffs
    nice. Always take care of it up!

  9. Hallo
    \ alsgevolg ik Goji bessen extract neem elke ochtend voel ik mezelf veel gezonder in mijn systeem

Its not possible to make comments anymore.

More informationens

Twitter

Polls

How should PP New Zealand react to PP Australia leaving Pirate Parties International?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...